{"id":2263,"date":"2009-12-10T13:15:19","date_gmt":"2009-12-10T19:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tancos.net\/wp2\/?p=2263"},"modified":"2009-12-10T13:15:19","modified_gmt":"2009-12-10T19:15:19","slug":"low-brow-violent-and-cynical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/low-brow-violent-and-cynical\/","title":{"rendered":"Low-brow, violent and cynical"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s been a while since I came across a quiz worth doing. Here’s one via former Kansan CapnFlynn<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Your result for Which fantasy writer are you?…<\/em><\/p>\n

Lian Hearn (b. 1942)<\/h4>\n

-1 High-Brow, 11 Violent, 31 Experimental and 13 Cynical!<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Congratulations! You are Low-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Lian Hearn is the pen name used by Australian author Gillian Rubinstein when writing theTale of the Otori <\/em>series, beginning with Across the Nightingale Floor<\/em> (2002). The trilogy (which has spawned a sequel and a prequel) was a great success, becoming bestsellers world-wide and being published in more than thirty countries.\u00a0Part of the reason for the series’ success\u00a0is probably that it is\u00a0traditional fantasy but with a twist: The books are set in a country resembling feudal Japan, rather than\u00a0some vaguely European environment.\u00a0This setting gives Hearn a great opportunity to explore themes such as war, revenge, power hunger and clashes between cultures,\u00a0all of which makes\u00a0for an occasionally\u00a0very violent tale, where nothing is ever coated in sugar. The books also feature at least one\u00a0strong and\u00a0very believable\u00a0female character. While there have been japanese-style fantasy written by Westerners\u00a0earlier (such as the Book of Years<\/em> series by Peter Morwood), Hearn uses the brilliant technique of\u00a0describing her world from inside<\/em>, calling typical japanese phenomena by generic names rather than exoticising Japanese terms. Thus, swords are called swords<\/em>, not katanas, we hear of wrestlers and realize that they are sumo wrestlers, characters eat bean curd rather than tofu, etc. All in all, Hearn has succesfully expanded the borders of what can be done within the genre, while still writing for a mass audience!<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0You are also a lot like C S Lewis.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

If you want something more gentle<\/span>, try Orson Scott Card.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

If you’d like a challenge, try your exact opposite<\/span>, Susan Cooper.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Your score<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is how to interpret your score: Your attitudes have been measured on four different scales, called\u00a01) High-Brow vs. Low-Brow, 2) Violent vs. Peaceful, 3) Experimental vs. Traditional and 4) Cynical vs. Romantic. Imagine that when you were born, you were in a state of innocence, a tabula rasa <\/em>who would have scored zero on each scale. Since then, a number of circumstances (including genetical, cultural and environmental factors) have pushed you towards either end of these scales. If you’re at 45 or -45 you would be almost entirely cynical, low-brow or whatever. The closer to zero you are, the less extreme your attitude. However, you should always<\/em> be more of\u00a0either (eg more romantic than cynical).\u00a0Please note that even\u00a0though High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical have positive numbers (1 through 45) and their opposites negative numbers (-1 through -45), this doesn’t mean that either quality is better. All attitudes have their positive and negative sides, as explained below.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

High-Brow vs. Low-Brow<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

You received -1 points, making you more Low-Brow <\/span>than High<\/span>-Brow. Being high-browed in this context refers to being more fascinated with the sort of art that critics and scholars tend to favour,\u00a0while a typical low-brow would favour\u00a0the best-selling kind. At their best<\/span>, low-brows are honest enough to read what they like, regardless of what “experts” and academics say is good for them. At their worst, they are more likely to read what their neighbours like than what they would choose themselves<\/span><\/span>.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Violent vs. Peaceful<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

You received 11 points, making you more Violent <\/span>than Peaceful. Please note<\/span> that violent in this context does not<\/span> mean that you, personally,\u00a0are prone to violence. This scale is a measurement of a) if you are tolerant to violence in fiction and b) whether you see violence as a means that can be used to achieve a good end. If you are, and you do, then you are violent as defined here. At their best<\/span>, violent people are the heroes who don’t hesitate to stop the villain threatening innocents by means of a good kick. At their worst<\/span>, they are the villains themselves.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Experimental vs. Traditional<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

You received 31 points, making you more Experimental <\/span>than Traditional. Your position on this scale indicates if you’re more likely to seek out the new and unexpected or if you are more comfortable with the familiar, especially in regards to culture. Note that traditional as defined here does not equal conservative, in the political sense. At their best<\/span>, experimental people are the ones who show humanity the way forward. At their worst<\/span>, they provoke for\u00a0the sake of\u00a0provocation only.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Cynical vs. Romantic<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

You received 13 points, making you more C<\/span>ynical <\/span>than Romantic. Your position on this scale indicates if you are more likely to be wary, suspicious and skeptical\u00a0to people around you and the world at large,\u00a0or if you are more likely to believe in grand schemes,\u00a0happy endings and the basic goodness of humankind. It is by far the most vaguely defined scale, which is why you’ll find the sentence “you are also a lot like x<\/em>” above. If you feel that your position on this scale is wrong, then you are probably more<\/em> like author x<\/em>. At their best<\/span>, cynical people are able to see through lies and spot crucial flaws in plans and schemes. At their worst<\/span>, they are overly negative, bringing everybody else down.<\/span><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Author picture from http:\/\/www.lianhearn.com<\/a>,\u00a0used by kind permission.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/strong><\/div>\n

Take Which fantasy writer are you?<\/a> at HelloQuizzy<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It’s been a while since I came across a quiz worth doing. Here’s one via former Kansan CapnFlynn: Your result for Which fantasy writer are you?… Lian Hearn (b. 1942) -1 High-Brow, 11 Violent, 31 Experimental and 13 Cynical! Congratulations! You are Low-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below. Lian Hearn is … Continue reading “Low-brow, violent and cynical”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[675],"class_list":["post-2263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quizzes","tag-quizzes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4xam3-Av","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2263\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shuffly.net\/zoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}